Thanks to dateable
hoards and site finds, we are pretty knowledgeable about the introduction of
bullion in England. Current evidence suggests that bullion was being used by
some of the earliest Viking raiders and settlers in England – that is, in the
870s, around the same time as bullion use was developing within
Scandinavia.
The end-date of
the metal-weight economy in England is less clear, however. The latest silver hoards from the Danelaw are
found in northern England, and date to the late 920s (e.g. the Vale of York
hoard, deposited c927-28). But the evidence from single finds suggests that
bullion use continued for longer than the hoards alone indicate. A handful of recent discoveries of
foreign and pecked coins, treated as bullion rather than as coins,
suggest instead that the bullion economy continued into the 930s, and possibly
beyond.
A tiny dirham fragment from Yorkshire. Photo by Ian Cartwright |
A better preserved dirham, similar to the one found in Yorkshire |
The end-date of
bullion use in England is important– and not just for pedantic scholarly
reasons. Since bullion use was a
distinctly Scandinavian economic and cultural practice in this
period, its longevity in England provides a useful measure of the degree of Anglo-Saxon and
Scandinavian assimilation. In a scenario
in which the Scandinavians quickly adopted local practices, we might expect the
use of bullion to have been relatively short-lived –perhaps not extending
beyond a generation or two. But perhaps we're now seeing opposing evidence: the Scandinavian way of doing business - or at least their means of exchange - seems to have continued in some areas for an extended period. Although we must be careful not to infer too much from a small number of finds, these coins offer hints for a continued separateness of the Scandinavian
settlers and their descendants from the existing, local population.
Reading Gert Rispling's name takes me back to the Fitzwilliam Coin Room immediately; it seems perverse that there is only one person we can turn to for this kind of expertise, but on the other hand one cannot easily imagine someone being encouraged to make that specialism their career. The whole post serves as a welcome reminder of something that came up in a seminar I was at recently where in questions someone wondered whether we had adequately considered the role of the opening of the Harz silver mines in Germany on the development of the Old English state. As this sort of find helps to remind us, that was not the only source for silver in England...
ReplyDeleteIndeed, but re: the sources of silver in England, it is worth noting that the number of dirhams which made it to Britain and Ireland is tiny in comparison to the vast numbers reaching Scandinavia - what we're seeing is very much a trickle at the end of the line. Plus, there is a significant decline in the import of dirhams from the later part of the 10thC, which appears to correlate well with an increase in the appearance of Anglo-Saxon and German coins within Scandinavia (ie. western sources are replacing the declining dirham stock). THe Harz mines seem to reopen in the 960s, so I'm not sure that dirhams provided an alternative source of silver at this date....But I completely agree about the importance of people like Gert! There are very few people to turn to, and identifying these coins is not something you can just 'pick up'.
ReplyDelete