The recent
excavation of a Carolingian silver cup found in 2014 as part of the Galloway
hoard revealed a number of extraordinary objects. Among them was a series of
large Anglo-Saxon silver disc brooches, in styles that date them to the ninth
century. Such objects, worn by the
Anglo-Saxon elite (possibly in pairs) seem like an obvious choice for inclusion
in a Viking hoard. Yet rarely are
Anglo-Saxon silver objects found in such contexts.
One of the 9th century Anglo-Saxon silver brooches, here with preserved textile, from the Galloway hoard (copyright Historic Scotland) |
Anglo-Saxon
silver items such as brooches, mounts and strap-ends, ought to have been highly
prized by the Vikings. Surviving ninth-century silver is usually good quality (over
90% precious metal), an important feature for the Vikings who carefully screened for debased metal. It is also highly decorative, frequently depicting
lively, semi-naturalistic animals in the so-called Trewhiddle style (as seen on the brooch below). These are given added emphasis by niello
inlay, a black copper/ silver sulphide, which provides a striking contrast with
a silver background. In Viking hands, such
silver could be worn as high-status dress items, or broken up as a form of
hack-silver currency.
Why this
unexpected absence? The Galloway hoard demonstrates that Anglo-Saxon silver
objects must have passed through Viking hands, and Anglo-Saxon silver coins are
a common component of hoards from Britain. Clearly, it is not a question about
access to silver.
The answer may lie in the form of the silver itself. Large disc brooches were not part of Scandinavian dress, while the distinctive animal and vegetal decoration of precious metalwork set it apart from indigenous Viking styles. I think it’s likely that Anglo-Saxon silver objects were routinely melted down into forms that the Vikings found more ‘acceptable’, such as ingots and rings. Silver is these forms fit more readily with the Viking aesthetic and could be easily assimilated into their currency systems.
In principle, then, the Scandinavian bullion economy made use of all silver, regardless of its form. But in reality, it preferenced silver in a limited range of homegrown and instantly recognisable shapes.
The answer may lie in the form of the silver itself. Large disc brooches were not part of Scandinavian dress, while the distinctive animal and vegetal decoration of precious metalwork set it apart from indigenous Viking styles. I think it’s likely that Anglo-Saxon silver objects were routinely melted down into forms that the Vikings found more ‘acceptable’, such as ingots and rings. Silver is these forms fit more readily with the Viking aesthetic and could be easily assimilated into their currency systems.
In principle, then, the Scandinavian bullion economy made use of all silver, regardless of its form. But in reality, it preferenced silver in a limited range of homegrown and instantly recognisable shapes.
Can I direct you to a thread at another site that discusses a weight I own? I have sent and email to Dr Gareth Williams at the BM but have received no replay as of yet. It contains an early 8th century sceat. Thanks in Advance https://www.cointalk.com/threads/anglo-saxon-viking-coin-weight.279099/
ReplyDeleteThanks for this. I saw the photo - I think it's likely your weight is 9thC. Although the embedded coin is earlier, the triangular markings are something we see quite a lot on Viking-Age material (ie. 9-10thC), and the weights as a whole do belong to this later time period - some of them utilising coins which would have been old at the time.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the quick reply. There were so few of these available to view on-line, that it was hard to find a direct comparison. I found your publications quite interesting. I learned quite a bit about trade in the period. Thanks again.
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot for such a cognitive post
ReplyDeleteFascinating - I had no idea.
ReplyDelete