The Watlington hoard contains nearly 200 silver coins, the
vast majority of them minted by the Anglo-Saxon kings Alfred ('the Great') of Wessex and Ceolwulf II of Mercia. These coins
would have been standard currency in their area of jurisdiction during the
870s, so how did so many end up in the coffers of one (or more) Vikings?
One distinct possibility is that the coins represent ransom
payment given by the Anglo-Saxons to the Vikings to, essentially, get them to
go away. This
practice is well documented in the late tenth century, when the Anglo-Saxon
king Æthelred, nicknamed Æthelred Unræd ie. the Unready (ruled 978-1013 and 1014-1016 AD) made a policy of
paying out huge sums of tribute payments to would-be Viking attackers. As a
result, thousands of Æthelred’s coins have been found in Scandinavia (see pictures
below). This tactic may explain why Æthelred the Unready was so named: translated from the Old
English, his name means “noble counsel, bad-counsel” (or, as one eminent Anglo-Saxonist
put it “noble counsel, my foot!").
The front of the same coin, cleaned up. (my photo) |
But
although often associated with Æthelred, ransom payments are also hinted at in
the ninth century. In a typically English indirect style, the Anglo-Saxon
Chronicle describes how the Anglo-Saxons ‘made peace’ with Viking forces on
various occasions during the military campaigns of the 870s and 880s, thereby
averting battle. On such occasions, Viking forces probably demanded, and
received, cash in hand. This is certainly suggested by other sources. A
document from 872 describes how the bishop of Worcester, one Wærferth, resorted to selling land for gold because of the ‘very pressing
affliction and immense tribute of the barbarians’. The Vikings pursued a similar policy of
extracting cash bribes during their raids on the Carolingian Empire and in
Continental sources there is no such beating around the bush. In 866, Charles
(the Bald) ‘made peace with those Northmen at the price of 4,000 lbs of silver,
according to their scales’ (the Vikings were clearly dealing with silver by
weight). He later ‘collected the amount he had agreed to pay those Northmen, both in silver and in wine’.
The Watlington hoard was hidden immediately following
an intense period of Viking military activity in southwest England. Alfred had
‘made peace’ with the Vikings at Wareham in 875 and at Exeter shortly thereafter. Alfred defeated the Vikings, under their leader Guthrum,
at Edington in 878. Some weeks later, Guthrum was a guest at Alfred’s
court; here, Alfred sponsored Guthrum's baptism and ‘greatly honoured him and his
companions with riches’. The coins in the Watlington hoard may have been
acquired by the Vikings on one or any of these occasions, with the Anglo-Saxon
Chronicle – a pro-Wessex/ Alfred account – understandably not wanting to detail
the cash transfer. Certainly, the coins
have a narrow date range and this is a good indication that they were gathered together shortly
before being deposited.
Silver coin of Ceolwulf II of Mercia, who is recorded only fleetingly in contemporary annals, and who disappeared around the same time the Watlington hoard was buried (c. 879/80). |
But, beyond being a ransom payment, there is another, intriguing, possibility. This
period also saw Alfred, ruler of Wessex, take over the neighboring kingdom of
Mercia, and in c 879 AD, the Mercian ruler Ceolwulf II vanishes without
trace (see blog below). Could the coins have been
acquired by the Vikings not as tribute, but as payment by Alfred for military services
against Ceolwulf?
This is pure speculation, and would involve an otherwise undocumented alliance between Alfred and the Vikings. Still, the hoard was deposited at exactly the
same time Ceolwulf drops out of historical sight.
No comments:
Post a Comment